People who are a lot smarter and more business-savvy than I am (which admittedly is not saying much) have asked me if I have Google Analytics for this site. I tell them that I’m sure I should, but it sounds so…analytical. After all, this is a not-for-profit endeavor and I’m not terribly interested in demographics. Perhaps this stance would soften if I actually understood the implications. I have, for instance, learned in recent days that people in Chiang Mai read (and endorse) this blog. I know, from the messages I am always happy to receive, that people I know (and people I’ve never met) read and are occasionally moved by my writing. What else is there that needs to be said?
According to the “Site Stats” (which I have to trust since my friend and guru JB initially made me aware of them), this blog has been visited over 8,000 times in the month of August. That’s about 8oo times more hits than it received in its first month of existence, back in October 2008. In May of 2009 there were 3,683 hits, and that record stood for a while (and seemed both impressive and humbling, then). Back in January I thought, maybe I can reach the 5,000 mark in 2010, a goal I achieved in April. I’m not sure what has accounted for the growing numbers, but I have to suspect some friends have told some friends. This is the definition of grassroots, because I’ve done little (much to my more business and web-savvy friends’ chagrin) to promote this site. I have also resisted any temptation to put ads or a “tip jar” on the site: I like the idea of having a blog that costs nothing to visit and I don’t intend to change that policy. I do have some ideas about how to make some of this work more easily collectable (for the handful of people not related to me who may be interested in collecting any of my work in a semi-formal manner), and I welcome the long overdue and most welcome advancements the publishing scene is embracing (however reluctantly). More thoughts on that subject (the big picture and my envisioned place in it) another time.
It seemed appropriate (and right) to acknowledge this minor milestone — and extend sincere appreciation for anyone who has taken the time to check out Murphy’s Law. For people who have come back more than once, I’m grateful. For people who come back all the time, I feel I should offer my condolences. But seriously, people don’t do what I do unless they hope they can articulate some thoughts and convey some feelings that just might resonate with and inspire others. It is with the aim of doing that as honestly and consistently as possible that I look forward to playing the truth of what I am, for as long as I can.


Hey–I just wanted to let you know that I stumbled upon your blog a few months ago and like it very much! It’s a change from the sciency-geeky-type blogs I usually read!
I love how you link music to … everything.
Keep it up!
(from Canada–nowhere exotic)
Deb:
I’m glad you found the blog and I appreciate the props. And the Great White North is plenty exotic as far as I’m concerned!
Cheers!
Murph
the most impressive thing about this post is the professional quality of your KISS make-up.
congratulations on 8K
i bet you have 10K next month
I have returned more than once, no need to offer your condolences. I think the numbers speak volumes, in this case, thousands of volumes. Some of us who do not mind using our gray matter, are desperate to read a well written and well articulated blog-even if it is on Sarah Palin.
Glad you used GA, it is an interesting tool. You had more visits than our program on seafood contaminants. Maybe we need to soften up a bit or scare the hell out of parents.
Best,
M
I think I found your site a few months ago after I decided I wanted to get into this whole RSS thing (5+ years late). I didn’t have enough feeds to give my reader much content, so I searched around. I probably found Murphy’s Law through a search of “Herzog,” or another name. Or maybe through feeds similar to WFMU (which I *hope* you are familiar with).
Either way, I appreciate your views, your writing, and your taste – just enough overlap between it and mine to hold my attention, but not enough it to be uninteresting.
Keep it up!
David:
Very glad you found the site and you’ve kept coming back.
I particularly appreciate your avatar; serendipitously, I’m about to have a big feature on the 40th anniversary reissue/remaster of ‘Bitches Brew’ drop @ PopMatters (maybe tomorrow?) so you may get a kick out of it.
Cheers!
Murph
Michelle:
Perhaps you are overlooking how *sexy* seafood contaminants can be!
(Okay, maybe it’s best to go with the scare tactics!)
Thanks (again) for dropping in!
xo
Sean